Read about Azim Chowdhury and Eric Gotting’s role in this pivotal decision here.
Azim Chowdhury and Eric Gotting Featured in Vapor Voice Article “Indiana’s Vapor Revamp: Following a rebuke in court, Indiana fixes its vapor rules”
Keller and Heckman LLP Victory for the Right to be Smoke-Free Coalition and E-Vapor Industry in Indiana
The U.S. Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the Right to be Smoke-Free Coalition holding that portions of Indiana’s E-Liquid Law are unconstitutional as applied to out-of-state manufacturers
On January 30, 2017, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit issued its decision in Legato Vapors LLC et al. v. David
Azim Chowdhury Interviewed in VB2B Winter Edition
Azim Chowdhury was interviewed in VB2B’s Winter Edition. Azim discussed current events in the e-vapor industry and what companies need to do in the face of rapid regulatory change.
- What are the different services Keller Heckman offers the business owners?
We are a regulatory law firm specializing in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA),
Right to be Smoke-Free Coalition and E-Vapor Industry Trade Associations file Motion for Summary Judgment in Lawsuit Challenging FDA’s Deeming Regulation and the Tobacco Control Act
On July 25, 2016, Keller and Heckman LLP, on behalf of the Right to be Smoke Free Coalitionand ten national and state e-vapor industry trade associations (the “E-Vapor Coalition”), filed a Motion for Summary Judgement in a lawsuitchallenging parts of the Tobacco Control Act (TCA) and the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) recently published “Deeming
Right To Be Smoke Free Coalition and E-Vapor Industry Trade Associations File Lawsuit Challenging FDA’s Deeming Regulation and the Tobacco Control Act
On behalf of the Right To Be Smoke Free Coalition and the entire e-vapor industry, yesterday Keller and Heckman LLP filed a Complaint in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia challenging portions of FDA’s Deeming Regulation and the Tobacco Control Act on various constitutional and administrative grounds. The named Plaintiffs in the