Eric Gotting serves as a partner in the firm’s litigation and environmental practice groups specializing in complex civil and appellate matters, as well as internal investigations and regulatory compliance. He focuses on a broad range of legal issues, including administrative law, agency enforcement actions, toxic torts, product liability, general business litigation, and regulatory compliance. He works with a diverse set of industries, including chemicals, plastics, pesticides, fuels/pipeline, food/packaging, consumer goods, telecommunications, and e-cigarettes/e-liquids. Mr. Gotting joined Keller and Heckman in 2011, and is a former Am Law 50 litigation partner and U.S. Department of Justice trial attorney.
Litigation and Regulatory Compliance Experience
Mr. Gotting has handled cases across the country, having tried matters to verdict and argued appeals before federal and state appellate courts. His experience includes class actions, mass tort litigation, administrative law, and agency proceedings. Between 1999 and 2004, Mr. Gotting took leave from private practice and served as a trial attorney with the U.S. Department of Justice’s Civil Division, Environmental Torts Section, where he defended the federal government in multimillion dollar toxic tort cases filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act.
Mr. Gotting has litigated and counseled clients on challenges to federal and state statutes, regulations, and orders. His experience covers various constitutional and administrative law issues, including the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) and state equivalents, the Dormant Commerce Clause, the First Amendment, the Due Process Clause, federal preemption, and the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). He also has filed amicus briefs in litigation involving significant regulatory issues facing a variety of industrial sectors. As part of recent efforts by Congress to reform the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), Mr. Gotting provided chemical manufacturers with extensive advice regarding preemption issues and co-authored two American Bar Association “white papers” on federal/state relations.
Enforcement Actions, Internal Investigations, and Regulatory Compliance
Mr. Gotting has defended enforcement actions and provided regulatory compliance counseling in a number of areas, including chemical and pesticide control, hazardous waste, pipeline safety, the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, occupational safety and health, Superfund cost-recovery actions, insurance coverage disputes, the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, and the Chemical Weapons Convention.
Mr. Gotting also has conducted extensive internal corporate investigations regarding potential regulatory compliance and litigation-related liabilities, including toxic torts, product liability, consumer fraud, and commercial contract disputes.
Recently, Mr. Gotting has advised clients on several emerging issues, including e-vapor products, nanotechnology, hydraulic fracturing, the Securities and Exchange Commission’s conflict minerals reporting rule, Green Chemistry laws, the regulation of genetically-modified organisms (GMOs), the Globally Harmonized System amendment to OSHA’s HazCom Standard, and coal ash.
Mr. Gotting has extensive experience litigating toxic tort cases involving claims of personal injuries and property damage from alleged exposures to materials such as volatile and semi-volatile compounds, specialty chemicals, pesticides, gasoline, radioactive waste, and heavy metals. He has defended claims involving the entire range of environmental media, including drinking water, soil, groundwater, and air contamination. He has worked with, and defended against, experts in numerous scientific and business-related fields, including toxicology, geochemistry, hydrogeology, structural engineering, neuropsychology, health physics, survey techniques, statistics, real estate appraisal, and environmental remediation.
Mr. Gotting currently serves on the firm’s Marketing Committee and Pro Bono Committee. He also served on the King Farm Citizen Assembly’s External Affairs Committee in 2005 through 2009. He has provided various pro bono legal services throughout his career, working with groups such as the Legal Counsel for the Elderly and serving as an appointed attorney in federal habeas cases.
The U.S. Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the Right to be Smoke-Free Coalition holding that portions of Indiana’s E-Liquid Law are unconstitutional as applied to out-of-state manufacturers
On January 30, 2017, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit issued its decision in Legato Vapors LLC et al. v. David…
On July 25, 2016, Keller and Heckman LLP, on behalf of the Right to be Smoke Free Coalitionand ten national and state e-vapor industry trade associations (the “E-Vapor Coalition”), filed a Motion for Summary Judgement in a lawsuitchallenging parts of the Tobacco Control Act (TCA) and the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) recently published “Deeming…
On behalf of the Right To Be Smoke Free Coalition and the entire e-vapor industry, yesterday Keller and Heckman LLP filed a Complaint in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia challenging portions of FDA’s Deeming Regulation and the Tobacco Control Act on various constitutional and administrative grounds. The named Plaintiffs in the…